| Thread Review (Newest First) |
| Posted by xabier - 05-06-24, 05:08 |
(15-11-23, 19:20)equant Wrote: I've just spend many hours looking at both SamplerBox and SquishBox to figure out which I'll move forward with and I have to say that from my experience SamplerBox is definitely more user and hacker friendly. I have tried samplerbox a little, and I love its concept much more than squishbox's, but using readily available soundfonts seems tempting... Is the boot time similar for both? |
| Posted by equant - 15-11-23, 19:20 |
| I've just spend many hours looking at both SamplerBox and SquishBox to figure out which I'll move forward with and I have to say that from my experience SamplerBox is definitely more user and hacker friendly. |
| Posted by - 12-11-23, 20:29 |
[quote pid="524" dateline="1697891663"](30-09-23, 13:00)Squishbox does not seem to provide round robin. Wrote: Recently I've used squishbox created by Bill Peterson [/quote] What do you meen whit round robin. |
| Posted by - 21-10-23, 12:34 |
(30-09-23, 13:00)Squishbox does not seem to provide round robin. Wrote: Recently I've used squishbox created by Bill Peterson |
| Posted by Sur - 30-09-23, 13:00 |
|
Recently I've used squishbox created by Bill Peterson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0lJY4uJ...iteTornado I use both Samplerbox and Squishbox. I don't want to be rude, but Squishbox is much user-friendlier than the Samplerbox. There is no-waiting time anymore when you choose from a sampler to another. You can create complex custom settings because it uses soundfonts. Now I am using the Squishbox instead of Samplerbox Check the website too https://geekfunklabs.com/products/squishbox/ |